+- +-

+- You

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+- Site Data

Members
Total Members: 85
Latest: Kyser91
New This Month: 2
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 112746
Total Topics: 4373
Most Online Today: 6
Most Online Ever: 55
(April 18, 2016, 06:09:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 0
Total: 0

Poll

Who is your favorite SCOTUS Justice?

John Roberts
1 (100%)
Anthony Kennedy
0 (0%)
Clarence Thomas
0 (0%)
Ruth Baden Ginsburg
0 (0%)
Stephen Breyer
0 (0%)
Samuel Alito
0 (0%)
Sonia Sotomayor
0 (0%)
Elena Kagan
0 (0%)
Neil Gorsuch
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Author Topic: The US Supreme Court Thread  (Read 387 times)

ChillinDylan Godsend

  • God-King
  • Wes Anderson
  • **********
  • Posts: 7478
Re: The US Supreme Court Thread
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2018, 11:18:29 pm »
Figured there would be a thread here.  I'm gonna throw my 2 cents in while I have the chance.

I believe that SCOTUS appointments should be delayed until after the midterms.  I believe this should be a rule - that within the final 6 months of a presidential or midterm election season, that no SCOTUS appointments be made.  Furthermore, outside of that 6 month window, there will be no delaying SCOTUS appointments by the "other side" whoever that may be.

Now, that being said, I am under no delusions that if the roles were reversed and the Dems had full control and the Reps were the minority party at all levels, the Dems would surely ram through "their guy" (much like the Reps will do now), and the Reps would whine and complain about how unfair it is (much like the Dems are already doing now).  Both sides are equally partisan hypocrites when it comes to this type of shit.

So, while I would certainly prefer a delay until after the midterms, I understand that the Reps will not delay just as the Dems would not delay if they had the ball.  We need a rule that fixes this ambiguous talking point, because I believe the newly elected officials should have a voice in this matter.
I mean, this horseshit only started because the Republicans blocked the Garland nomination for over a year...

Of course you would think that...


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/22/biden_in_1992_bush_should_not_name_a_nominee_until_after_the_november_election.html

False. Equivalency.

LOL - wrong.  So Dems said "no SCOTUS appointment in an election year" in 1992 when a Republican was in office.  But in 2015 Dems said "we must appoint SCOTUS in an election year" when a Democrat was in office.  Now, in 2018 it's back to "no SCOTUS appointment in an election year" when a Republican is in office.

This isn't false equivalency.  This is absolutely comparing apples to apples.  It doesn't get more equivalent than that.

 

+- Hot Threads

The Trump Presidency Thread by Robert Neville
Today at 05:03:34 pm

2 Fudge 2 Knuckle by Tut
Today at 04:17:03 am

THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD by Charles Longboat Jr.
Today at 12:41:54 am

What song are you listening to - Part II by Charles Longboat Jr.
September 22, 2018, 02:55:30 pm

Book Thread. What are you reading? by Robert Neville
September 21, 2018, 04:10:14 pm

MWO Movie News, a subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company by Charles Longboat Jr.
September 20, 2018, 07:51:25 pm

Whats your take on movie crowdfunding? by Robert Neville
September 16, 2018, 07:23:03 am

Consensus XXXIII: Netflicks Moovys by Crohn's Boy
September 14, 2018, 04:06:15 pm

THE SCHOOL THREAD! by Tut
September 07, 2018, 04:43:28 pm

Favorite videogame cutscenes by Robert Neville
September 06, 2018, 02:55:25 pm

The Official Movie Trailer/TV Spot Watching Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
September 04, 2018, 04:10:19 pm

The US Supreme Court Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
September 04, 2018, 03:02:07 pm

Top 10 Horror Films... by Crohn's Boy
September 04, 2018, 09:56:00 am

Best All-Time Disney Theatrical Animated Films... by Kale Pasta
August 30, 2018, 08:56:21 am

Recent purchases (part II) by Hazelrabbit2006
August 25, 2018, 09:29:10 am