+- +-

+- You

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+- Site Data

Members
Total Members: 82
Latest: ng4ever
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 1
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 112501
Total Topics: 4370
Most Online Today: 11
Most Online Ever: 55
(April 18, 2016, 06:09:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 1
Total: 2

Poll

Who is your favorite SCOTUS Justice?

John Roberts
1 (100%)
Anthony Kennedy
0 (0%)
Clarence Thomas
0 (0%)
Ruth Baden Ginsburg
0 (0%)
Stephen Breyer
0 (0%)
Samuel Alito
0 (0%)
Sonia Sotomayor
0 (0%)
Elena Kagan
0 (0%)
Neil Gorsuch
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Author Topic: The US Supreme Court Thread  (Read 331 times)

ChillinDylan Godsend

  • God-King
  • Wes Anderson
  • **********
  • Posts: 7478
Re: The US Supreme Court Thread
« Reply #20 on: June 27, 2018, 11:18:29 pm »
Figured there would be a thread here.  I'm gonna throw my 2 cents in while I have the chance.

I believe that SCOTUS appointments should be delayed until after the midterms.  I believe this should be a rule - that within the final 6 months of a presidential or midterm election season, that no SCOTUS appointments be made.  Furthermore, outside of that 6 month window, there will be no delaying SCOTUS appointments by the "other side" whoever that may be.

Now, that being said, I am under no delusions that if the roles were reversed and the Dems had full control and the Reps were the minority party at all levels, the Dems would surely ram through "their guy" (much like the Reps will do now), and the Reps would whine and complain about how unfair it is (much like the Dems are already doing now).  Both sides are equally partisan hypocrites when it comes to this type of shit.

So, while I would certainly prefer a delay until after the midterms, I understand that the Reps will not delay just as the Dems would not delay if they had the ball.  We need a rule that fixes this ambiguous talking point, because I believe the newly elected officials should have a voice in this matter.
I mean, this horseshit only started because the Republicans blocked the Garland nomination for over a year...

Of course you would think that...


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/02/22/biden_in_1992_bush_should_not_name_a_nominee_until_after_the_november_election.html

False. Equivalency.

LOL - wrong.  So Dems said "no SCOTUS appointment in an election year" in 1992 when a Republican was in office.  But in 2015 Dems said "we must appoint SCOTUS in an election year" when a Democrat was in office.  Now, in 2018 it's back to "no SCOTUS appointment in an election year" when a Republican is in office.

This isn't false equivalency.  This is absolutely comparing apples to apples.  It doesn't get more equivalent than that.

 

+- Hot Threads

The Official Movie Trailer/TV Spot Watching Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
Today at 10:03:35 pm

MWO Movie News, a subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company by Tut
Today at 08:53:25 pm

2 Fudge 2 Knuckle by Tut
Today at 02:48:13 pm

Star Wars VIII: The Last Jed by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 20, 2018, 05:59:34 pm

How should I name my iTunes and blu ray collection ? by ng4ever
July 20, 2018, 04:37:56 am

THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD by ChillinDylan Godsend
July 19, 2018, 10:33:33 pm

Best and Worst Performances of 2018 by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 19, 2018, 12:24:08 am

The Trump Presidency Thread by Kale Pasta
July 17, 2018, 06:15:13 pm

2018 Standings by ChillinDylan Godsend
July 16, 2018, 11:21:47 am

Book Thread. What are you reading? by Tut
July 16, 2018, 01:49:37 am

The Official "Going to see..." Movie Thread by Crohn's Boy
July 12, 2018, 04:11:39 pm

The US Supreme Court Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 09, 2018, 09:26:07 pm

2018 Russia World Cup thread by Kale Pasta
July 09, 2018, 05:55:49 pm

How are my fellow traitors to The Crown celebrating the Fourth? by Rupert Pupkin
July 06, 2018, 10:55:50 pm

THE SCHOOL THREAD! by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 05, 2018, 03:23:36 pm