+- +-

+- User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+- Site Stats

Members
Total Members: 135
Latest: Nate Ellis
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 99382
Total Topics: 4067
Most Online Today: 7
Most Online Ever: 55
(April 18, 2016, 06:09:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Poll

Live by Night

Great (9-10)
0 (0%)
Good (7-8)
1 (100%)
Average (4-6)
0 (0%)
Poor (2-3)
0 (0%)
Anus of Cinema (0-1)
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Author Topic: Live by Night  (Read 267 times)

Cutler de Chateau

  • Global Moderator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Head of Music News Operations at John Tyler News
Re: Live by Night
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2016, 01:34:49 pm »
Lol, you guys thought this would be good?
The first three films Affleck directed received scores of 94, 94 and 96 on the Tomatometer and many people, myself included, really enjoyed all three. Why would we not think this would be good?

On a side note, if this does end up being bad I'm gonna be Danny Oh level depressed.

Past performance is no indication of future success.
That just doesn't make any sense. Do the next movies from Scorsese and Bay have equal chances of being good?

I can kind of get where he's going with that statement.

A movie from a good director can still suck.  There's no 100% guarantee.  That being said, past performance is most certainly an indication of probable future success.  That's just an objective fact.
I mean, if he had said "Past performance doesn't always indicate future success" I would've agreed and it would have been a  valid critique of me being so sure this would be good. However, saying that the past is "no indication of future success" is just wrong.

Also, as Neville brought, he's being a bit hypocritical since he's always said that all future Marvel movies will suck.

Diego Tutweiller

  • Administrator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4505
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: Live by Night
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2016, 01:43:32 pm »
Lol, you guys thought this would be good?
The first three films Affleck directed received scores of 94, 94 and 96 on the Tomatometer and many people, myself included, really enjoyed all three. Why would we not think this would be good?

On a side note, if this does end up being bad I'm gonna be Danny Oh level depressed.

Past performance is no indication of future success.
That just doesn't make any sense. Do the next movies from Scorsese and Bay have equal chances of being good?

I can kind of get where he's going with that statement.

A movie from a good director can still suck.  There's no 100% guarantee.  That being said, past performance is most certainly an indication of probable future success.  That's just an objective fact.
I mean, if he had said "Past performance doesn't always indicate future success" I would've agreed and it would have been a  valid critique of me being so sure this would be good. However, saying that the past is "no indication of future success" is just wrong.

Okay, I mean... phrase it however you want, but my point still stands. With that comment, I was just thinking of people like M. Night Shamwow, who make one or two good films and are hailed as the second coming of Spielberg before making half a dozen movies that can't break the 20% barrier on RT. And sure, Affleck is no Shyamalan, but my point was just that when it comes to directors who haven't made a whole lot of films, a few good movies is not a reliable indicator that the next ones will be good too.

Diego Tutweiller

  • Administrator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4505
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: Live by Night
« Reply #22 on: December 22, 2016, 01:55:56 pm »
Also, as Neville brought, he's being a bit hypocritical since he's always said that all future Marvel movies will suck.

I don't think I ever said that they would all suck. I just said I don't want to give them any more of my money. I personally thought Doctor Strange had potential (at least more than a lot of their other films did), but I'm tired of paying to see films that I routinely dislike, so I didn't bother and I saw Hacksaw Ridge instead.

If Doctor Strange turns out to be good when I rent it from the library, maybe I'll reconsider. Right now though, I haven't paid to see a superhero movie since BVS, and I'm pretty pleased with that decision thus far.

John Tyler

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 10415
    • Flounder's Reviews
Re: Live by Night
« Reply #23 on: December 22, 2016, 04:02:01 pm »
I personally thought Doctor Strange had potential.
I thought you hate Eggs Benedict Cucumberbatch...

J. Kashmir

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 5511
  • Upon us all a little rain must fall
Re: Live by Night
« Reply #24 on: December 22, 2016, 04:04:16 pm »
I personally thought Doctor Strange had potential.
I thought you hate Eggs Benedict Cucumberbatch...
A movie can have a poor lead and still have potential; said potential would be derived from other qualities.

 

+- Hot Topics

The Official Movie Trailer/TV Spot Watching Thread by John Tyler
August 22, 2017, 09:52:57 pm

THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD by John Tyler
August 22, 2017, 08:57:06 pm

Game of Thrones by Diego Tutweiller
August 22, 2017, 11:53:30 am

THE TV SHOW WATCHING THREAD!! by Danny Darkoh
August 22, 2017, 02:37:15 am

The Movie/TV Facts Thread by John Tyler
August 21, 2017, 11:42:17 pm

Death Note by The One Who Lurks
August 21, 2017, 06:14:28 pm

Rick and Morty by CT_Sexybeast
August 21, 2017, 05:49:28 pm

Mother! by Diego Tutweiller
August 21, 2017, 12:56:22 pm

Tulip Fever by John Tyler
August 21, 2017, 12:37:31 pm

Atomic Blonde by Diego Tutweiller
August 21, 2017, 12:10:46 am

The Movie Pitch Thread by Robert Neville
August 20, 2017, 05:13:56 pm

Diego Tutweiller Presents: A Game of Trolls by Diego Tutweiller
August 20, 2017, 03:38:04 am

The One sentence movie summary thread! by John Tyler
August 19, 2017, 10:46:13 pm

Logan Lucky by Suspect #1
August 19, 2017, 03:02:35 pm

Recent purchases (part II) by Diego Tutweiller
August 18, 2017, 07:14:13 pm