+- +-

+- You

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+- Site Data

Members
Total Members: 81
Latest: usa3000#2018
New This Month: 0
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 112444
Total Topics: 4369
Most Online Today: 4
Most Online Ever: 55
(April 18, 2016, 06:09:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 2
Total: 2

Author Topic: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread  (Read 97 times)

Tut

  • God-King
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • ******
  • Posts: 6614
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #20 on: September 21, 2017, 12:27:15 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.


The One Who Lurks

  • Tyler Perry
  • **
  • Posts: 950
  • I'm still here. Lord knows why.
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #21 on: September 21, 2017, 12:41:59 am »
The one where Po goes through the same exact character arc as he did in the first?

How so?

I felt like the third was him coming to terms with his past rather than coming into his own strength, like the first one (and the 2nd one shamelessly copied)

Okay, seriously, it sounds like you're mixing the second and third one up.

The second one was more about him coming to terms with his past.

The third one was the one that shamelessly copied the first with the whole "coming into one's own strength" thing.

cupcake

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • **********
  • Posts: 9416
  • Hello
  • Location: Bryan Singer's lap
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #22 on: September 21, 2017, 12:46:56 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.



Actually, when I saw this film, it isn't as offensive as the name suggests.  It's pro-gay and pro-black at the same time. 
goodbye!

cupcake

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • **********
  • Posts: 9416
  • Hello
  • Location: Bryan Singer's lap
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2017, 12:49:41 am »
The one where Po goes through the same exact character arc as he did in the first?

How so?

I felt like the third was him coming to terms with his past rather than coming into his own strength, like the first one (and the 2nd one shamelessly copied)

Okay, seriously, it sounds like you're mixing the second and third one up.

The second one was more about him coming to terms with his past.

The third one was the one that shamelessly copied the first with the whole "coming into one's own strength" thing.

The 2nd one is the one with the peacock right?  It's been a while since I saw that film, so I may be a little iffy, but that film more or less felt like Po needed to regain some sorta inner strength while the 3rd felt like he was seeing his people for the first time and learning more about his ancestry as a panda.  His arc felt more or less like he was trying to find a balance between his past and his present with the whole two gay dads thing. 
goodbye!

Tut

  • God-King
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • ******
  • Posts: 6614
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2017, 12:53:05 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.



Actually, when I saw this film, it isn't as offensive as the name suggests.  It's pro-gay and pro-black at the same time. 

So I've heard. But a movie's title tells you what to expect from it, so it makes sense that if you don't like animated kid's movies, you wouldn't go see something called "Kung-Fu Panda." Just like how if you didn't like sci-fi movies, you wouldn't see "Alien," and if you weren't an emo faggot, you wouldn't see "Suicide Squad."

Kale Pasta

  • God-King
  • David Lynch
  • **********
  • Posts: 4657
  • And the path was a circle, round and round
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #25 on: September 21, 2017, 12:53:21 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.
I mean, of course. Diego is right about what to expect though, and I don't generally care for animated films outside of Pixar.

Tut

  • God-King
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • ******
  • Posts: 6614
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #26 on: September 21, 2017, 12:55:27 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.
I mean, of course. Diego is right about what to expect though, and I don't generally care for animated films outside of Pixar.

Moody fails to recognize that you were not judging the film. You merely said you didn't see it because the title put you off. You made no judgement about the actual quality of the movie, i.e. "The title is stupid so the movie is stupid."

cupcake

  • Alfred Hitchcock
  • **********
  • Posts: 9416
  • Hello
  • Location: Bryan Singer's lap
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #27 on: September 21, 2017, 12:56:36 am »
Judging a movie by its title is really stupid.



Actually, when I saw this film, it isn't as offensive as the name suggests.  It's pro-gay and pro-black at the same time. 

So I've heard. But a movie's title tells you what to expect from it, so it makes sense that if you don't like animated kid's movies, you wouldn't go see something called "Kung-Fu Panda." Just like how if you didn't like sci-fi movies, you wouldn't see "Alien," and if you weren't an emo faggot, you wouldn't see "Suicide Squad."

okay, but u can sit down and look at a movie called inside out and not think it's a porno
goodbye!

The One Who Lurks

  • Tyler Perry
  • **
  • Posts: 950
  • I'm still here. Lord knows why.
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #28 on: September 21, 2017, 01:09:46 am »
The one where Po goes through the same exact character arc as he did in the first?

How so?

I felt like the third was him coming to terms with his past rather than coming into his own strength, like the first one (and the 2nd one shamelessly copied)

Okay, seriously, it sounds like you're mixing the second and third one up.

The second one was more about him coming to terms with his past.

The third one was the one that shamelessly copied the first with the whole "coming into one's own strength" thing.

The 2nd one is the one with the peacock right?  It's been a while since I saw that film, so I may be a little iffy, but that film more or less felt like Po needed to regain some sorta inner strength while the 3rd felt like he was seeing his people for the first time and learning more about his ancestry as a panda.  His arc felt more or less like he was trying to find a balance between his past and his present with the whole two gay dads thing. 

Yeah, the second one was the one with the peacock, but it was about Po learning about his past and how that fit with the present, and finding inner peace in who he was, because he was all conflicted about that.

The third one didn't really go into how Po felt about the two dads thing.  That was a conflict that the two settled on their own.  Po's arc was more tied to mastering the whole inner strength chi thing and being a teacher, which led to him to learning the exact same lesson as Shifu in the first movie.

Tut

  • God-King
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • ******
  • Posts: 6614
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #29 on: September 21, 2017, 02:46:45 am »
I'm sorry, I didn't realize this was the Kung-Fu Panda discussion thread.

Crohn's Boy

  • David Fincher
  • ******
  • Posts: 4247
  • Hello
  • Location: My couch
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #30 on: September 21, 2017, 06:41:46 am »
Drop the hyphen.
Goodbye!
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Frankie

  • God-King
  • Paul Thomas Anderson
  • ******
  • Posts: 6691
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #31 on: September 21, 2017, 10:37:53 am »
Kung Fu Panda is one of the greatest animated films ever made.

The second is really fun too. Haven't seen the third.

Tho Master Fie

  • God-King
  • Sam Raimi
  • **********
  • Posts: 5403
  • Fear comes in waves
Re: The Kung-Fu Panda Discussion Thread
« Reply #32 on: September 21, 2017, 11:16:04 am »
Kung Fu Panda is one of the greatest animated films ever made.
Frank states a simple truth.
Though I don't know if it can beat out Ratatouille anymore.
Agree Agree x 3 View List

 

+- Hot Threads

Book Thread. What are you reading? by Tut
Today at 01:49:37 am

THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 15, 2018, 12:01:43 am

MWO Movie News, a subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 13, 2018, 12:20:18 pm

2 Fudge 2 Knuckle by Robert Neville
July 12, 2018, 05:27:57 pm

The Official "Going to see..." Movie Thread by Crohn's Boy
July 12, 2018, 04:11:39 pm

The Official Movie Trailer/TV Spot Watching Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 12, 2018, 12:16:23 pm

The Trump Presidency Thread by Tut
July 10, 2018, 03:31:47 pm

The US Supreme Court Thread by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 09, 2018, 09:26:07 pm

2018 Russia World Cup thread by Kale Pasta
July 09, 2018, 05:55:49 pm

How are my fellow traitors to The Crown celebrating the Fourth? by Rupert Pupkin
July 06, 2018, 10:55:50 pm

THE SCHOOL THREAD! by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 05, 2018, 03:23:36 pm

What song are you listening to - Part II by Charles Longboat Jr.
July 05, 2018, 12:12:29 am

Main NBA Thread... by cupcake
July 02, 2018, 05:38:56 pm

Mexican elections are today by Tut
July 02, 2018, 04:10:29 am

Best and Worst Performances of 2018 by Crohn's Boy
June 29, 2018, 05:42:19 pm