+- +-

+- User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+- Site Stats

Members
Total Members: 135
Latest: Nate Ellis
New This Month: 1
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 99382
Total Topics: 4067
Most Online Today: 7
Most Online Ever: 55
(April 18, 2016, 06:09:38 pm)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 1
Total: 1

Author Topic: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD  (Read 32360 times)

John Tyler

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 10415
    • Flounder's Reviews
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3660 on: August 09, 2017, 10:03:24 pm »
Detroit: 10/10

Kathryn Bigelow's best film since Strange Days.

Danny Darkoh

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Why do you wear that stupid bunny suit?
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3661 on: August 10, 2017, 02:32:14 am »
This is the worst **** film I have ever seen. Filthy, pinko vegetarian propaganda. Absolutely despicable. A corporation creates a fat **** pig creature with the intent of ending world hunger, and these hippie degenerates try to ruin everything because they're harming an animal that wouldn't have even existed without them. CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM THE FUCK UP!

What kind of a retard makes a movie like this? What kind of a sick person watches this and roots for the PETA people? This movie will only serve to fuel anti-GMO fever across the country among leftist morons who believe everything they see in movies. It is a pathetic, poorly-constructed straw man argument and it deserves the world's unending contempt.
I'd say it's more anti-corporation than anything else, and there are self aware scenes that poke fun at the absurdity of this movie's version of PETA... so...

Diego Tutweiller

  • Administrator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4505
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3662 on: August 10, 2017, 02:48:21 am »
This is the worst **** film I have ever seen. Filthy, pinko vegetarian propaganda. Absolutely despicable. A corporation creates a fat **** pig creature with the intent of ending world hunger, and these hippie degenerates try to ruin everything because they're harming an animal that wouldn't have even existed without them. CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM THE FUCK UP!

What kind of a retard makes a movie like this? What kind of a sick person watches this and roots for the PETA people? This movie will only serve to fuel anti-GMO fever across the country among leftist morons who believe everything they see in movies. It is a pathetic, poorly-constructed straw man argument and it deserves the world's unending contempt.
I'd say it's more anti-corporation than anything else, and there are self aware scenes that poke fun at the absurdity of this movie's version of PETA... so...

I still don't know why we should be against the corporation in the film, though. They were trying to feed the world through genetic innovation. What exactly did they do wrong?

Suspect #1

  • Nicolas Cage
  • ******
  • Posts: 3450
  • Hello
  • Location: My couch
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3663 on: August 10, 2017, 07:15:45 am »
Colossal: 10/10
Goodbye!
Like Like x 1 View List

J. Kashmir

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 5511
  • Upon us all a little rain must fall
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3664 on: August 10, 2017, 10:36:22 am »
This is the worst **** film I have ever seen. Filthy, pinko vegetarian propaganda. Absolutely despicable. A corporation creates a fat **** pig creature with the intent of ending world hunger, and these hippie degenerates try to ruin everything because they're harming an animal that wouldn't have even existed without them. CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM THE FUCK UP!

What kind of a retard makes a movie like this? What kind of a sick person watches this and roots for the PETA people? This movie will only serve to fuel anti-GMO fever across the country among leftist morons who believe everything they see in movies. It is a pathetic, poorly-constructed straw man argument and it deserves the world's unending contempt.
I'd say it's more anti-corporation than anything else, and there are self aware scenes that poke fun at the absurdity of this movie's version of PETA... so...

I still don't know why we should be against the corporation in the film, though. They were trying to feed the world through genetic innovation. What exactly did they do wrong?
The fact that they were acquiring their meat in unethical ways such as
Spoiler (hover to show)
is supposed to be their transgression since they weren't transparent about said methods, and only mentioned the pig growing contest thing.

I agree that some moral complexity for the corporation would've been very helpful to the film.

Robert Neville

  • Administrator
  • Ed Norton
  • ******
  • Posts: 1522
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3665 on: August 10, 2017, 02:27:10 pm »
This is the worst **** film I have ever seen. Filthy, pinko vegetarian propaganda. Absolutely despicable. A corporation creates a fat **** pig creature with the intent of ending world hunger, and these hippie degenerates try to ruin everything because they're harming an animal that wouldn't have even existed without them. CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM THE FUCK UP!

What kind of a retard makes a movie like this? What kind of a sick person watches this and roots for the PETA people? This movie will only serve to fuel anti-GMO fever across the country among leftist morons who believe everything they see in movies. It is a pathetic, poorly-constructed straw man argument and it deserves the world's unending contempt.
I'd say it's more anti-corporation than anything else, and there are self aware scenes that poke fun at the absurdity of this movie's version of PETA... so...

I still don't know why we should be against the corporation in the film, though. They were trying to feed the world through genetic innovation. What exactly did they do wrong?

I haven't seen the film yet, but the idea itself seems bullshit. The world already throws away more food than what is necessary to end all starvation. The parts of the world where it's still happening simply lack both the capability to produce enough of their own food & the funds and/or the will to buy it (which often crosses over into the lack of funds/will among nations bailing them out with aid as well.) How does this meat creature help again?

If it's created and owned by a Western (?) corporation, then there's no way South Sudan or Nigeria would be allowed to independently possess it to cover their needs. And since they can't buy even the cheapest food there is (and other countries won't buy it for them), how would they be able to buy enough of okja-burgers, unless the price is so cheap it would never ever cover all the costs sunk into genetically engineering it? If this creature existed in real life, I don't see how it would be more relevant to world hunger, then, say, whale meat (which Japan has an excess of from their "scientific" whaling, yet no famine-affected country ever even considered getting any?)

Diego Tutweiller

  • Administrator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4505
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3666 on: August 10, 2017, 02:39:43 pm »
This is the worst **** film I have ever seen. Filthy, pinko vegetarian propaganda. Absolutely despicable. A corporation creates a fat **** pig creature with the intent of ending world hunger, and these hippie degenerates try to ruin everything because they're harming an animal that wouldn't have even existed without them. CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM UP! CARVE 'EM THE FUCK UP!

What kind of a retard makes a movie like this? What kind of a sick person watches this and roots for the PETA people? This movie will only serve to fuel anti-GMO fever across the country among leftist morons who believe everything they see in movies. It is a pathetic, poorly-constructed straw man argument and it deserves the world's unending contempt.
I'd say it's more anti-corporation than anything else, and there are self aware scenes that poke fun at the absurdity of this movie's version of PETA... so...

I still don't know why we should be against the corporation in the film, though. They were trying to feed the world through genetic innovation. What exactly did they do wrong?

I haven't seen the film yet, but the idea itself seems bullshit. The world already throws away more food than what is necessary to end all starvation. The parts of the world where it's still happening simply lack both the capability to produce enough of their own food & the funds and/or the will to buy it (which often crosses over into the lack of funds/will among nations bailing them out with aid as well.) How does this meat creature help again?

If it's created and owned by a Western (?) corporation, then there's no way South Sudan or Nigeria would be allowed to independently possess it to cover their needs. And since they can't buy even the cheapest food there is (and other countries won't buy it for them), how would they be able to buy enough of okja-burgers, unless the price is so cheap it would never ever cover all the costs sunk into genetically engineering it? If this creature existed in real life, I don't see how it would be more relevant to world hunger, then, say, whale meat (which Japan has an excess of from their "scientific" whaling, yet no famine-affected country ever even considered getting any?)

I think the company's goal was to sell superpiglets to farmers in impoverished areas, which was why they sent piglets around the world to determine which climate/living conditions suit them best. From what I could tell, the profit was going to come from owning the rights to the genetic makeup of the animals. And while you're right that there's enough food in the world to feed everyone, we need the right food in the right places. Small villages in Africa can't grow certain crops, and large African animals can trample and destroy large swaths of farmland. If the issue is getting the food to these people, then growing a large animal like Okja makes sense. African farmers would be able to breed them, and they could defend themselves against marauding hippopotamuses much better than a few ears of corn could.

Just spitballing here, since the actual plan is never outlined in the movie and is conveniently glossed over. But if I was running this company and had created such an animal, that's probably the angle I would take.

Robert Neville

  • Administrator
  • Ed Norton
  • ******
  • Posts: 1522
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3667 on: August 10, 2017, 03:16:17 pm »
I think the company's goal was to sell superpiglets to farmers in impoverished areas, which was why they sent piglets around the world to determine which climate/living conditions suit them best. From what I could tell, the profit was going to come from owning the rights to the genetic makeup of the animals. And while you're right that there's enough food in the world to feed everyone, we need the right food in the right places. Small villages in Africa can't grow certain crops, and large African animals can trample and destroy large swaths of farmland. If the issue is getting the food to these people, then growing a large animal like Okja makes sense. African farmers would be able to breed them, and they could defend themselves against marauding hippopotamuses much better than a few ears of corn could.

Just spitballing here, since the actual plan is never outlined in the movie and is conveniently glossed over. But if I was running this company and had created such an animal, that's probably the angle I would take.

This idea reminds me a bit of the Bt cotton and its use in India. Basically, it's a variety that was genetically engineered to repel pests on its own and so not need much pesticide, and it was largely a success, now accounting for 95% of all cotton there. However, it requires more water than regular one, and so while Indian cotton growing as whole benefited, the poorest farmers who do not have water for irrigation have actually done a lot worse. I can't help but think something like that would be the best-case scenario, because well, it's still going to require feed, and there's no way it could be grazed on areas already prone to desertification from regular farm animals (i.e. ones poor people own), so it's again going to be the rich Nigerian/South Sudanese/Kenyan etc. farmers benefiting foremost. (Assuming that works in the first place.)
« Last Edit: August 10, 2017, 03:25:21 pm by Robert Neville »

Robert Neville

  • Administrator
  • Ed Norton
  • ******
  • Posts: 1522
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3668 on: August 10, 2017, 03:16:47 pm »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.

John Tyler

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 10415
    • Flounder's Reviews
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3669 on: August 10, 2017, 11:13:22 pm »
From Up on Poppy Hill: 8/10
The Wind Rises: 10/10
Equilibrium (rewatch): 6/10
Atlantis: The Lost Empire (rewatch): 9/10
Willow (rewatch): 9/10 ( previously 8 )
West Side Story (rewatch): 10/10
Annabelle: Creation: 7/10

J. Kashmir

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 5511
  • Upon us all a little rain must fall
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3670 on: August 11, 2017, 12:26:34 am »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
You missed the opportunity to make a better pun such as "Valerian and the City of a Thousand Plotholes" or something to that effect. Still though, I think that rating is a bit extreme, speaking as someone who wasn't a fan of the film.

Speaking of Prometheus and underwhelming sci-if, I'm mildly curious to see what your reaction to Alien Covenant would be, given that it doubles down on some of Prometheus' problems but also spits in the face of the story its predecessor tried to tell.

CT_Sexybeast

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 5579
  • Wouldst thou like to live deliciously?
  • Location: NW
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3671 on: August 11, 2017, 03:26:23 am »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
I enjoyed all the films you listed in this post.
Like Like x 2 Agree Agree x 1 View List

Suspect #1

  • Nicolas Cage
  • ******
  • Posts: 3450
  • Hello
  • Location: My couch
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3672 on: August 11, 2017, 10:18:07 pm »
Annabelle: Creation - 8/10
Goodbye!

John Tyler

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 10415
    • Flounder's Reviews
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3673 on: August 11, 2017, 10:28:22 pm »
When Marnie Was There: 10/10
Kiki's Delivery Service: 10/10
Freeway: 10/10
The Wizard (rewatch): 7/10
Anastasia (rewatch): 8/10
The Next Three Days (rewatch): 7/10
Waitress: 7/10
The Glass Castle: 6/10
« Last Edit: August 11, 2017, 10:52:35 pm by John Tyler »

Cutler de Chateau

  • Global Moderator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Head of Music News Operations at John Tyler News
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3674 on: August 11, 2017, 10:31:36 pm »
When Marnie Was There: 10/10
Kiki's Delivery Service: 10/10
Freeway: 10/10
The Wizard (rewatch): 7/10
Anastasia (rewatch): 8/10
The Next Three Days (rewatch): 7/10
The Glass Castle: 6/10

Dude... wtf!?

John Tyler

  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 10415
    • Flounder's Reviews
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3675 on: August 11, 2017, 10:44:24 pm »
When Marnie Was There: 10/10
Kiki's Delivery Service: 10/10
Freeway: 10/10
The Wizard (rewatch): 7/10
Anastasia (rewatch): 8/10
The Next Three Days (rewatch): 7/10
The Glass Castle: 6/10

Dude... wtf!?
Do not question the ways and abilities of the Flounder, my dear boy.

Diego Tutweiller

  • Administrator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 4505
  • It's all over now, baby blue...
  • Location: Nice try, NSA
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3676 on: August 11, 2017, 10:51:16 pm »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
I enjoyed all the films you listed in this post.

People who like Desolation of Smaug are the weakest race.

Cutler de Chateau

  • Global Moderator
  • Jeff Goldblum
  • ******
  • Posts: 7221
  • Head of Music News Operations at John Tyler News
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3677 on: August 11, 2017, 10:55:30 pm »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
I enjoyed all the films you listed in this post.

People who like Desolation of Smaug are the weakest race.

Wow, a lot of black people must love that film. 

Robert Neville

  • Administrator
  • Ed Norton
  • ******
  • Posts: 1522
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3678 on: August 12, 2017, 12:49:03 pm »
Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
I enjoyed all the films you listed in this post.

Yeah, I remember that. To continue in the same vein, some moments in this film actually reminded me of Knight of Cups a lot. There's that hugely self-indulgent scene, and character of Valerian shares many parallels with lead character of Knight of Cups, none of them good.

Also, saw Valerian and the Thousand Pieces of Shit. This actually made me wonder halfway through whether Prometheus and John Carter were as bad as I thought. Though, the closest comparison is probably Desolanus of Smaug. Either way, 1/10.
You missed the opportunity to make a better pun such as "Valerian and the City of a Thousand Plotholes" or something to that effect. Still though, I think that rating is a bit extreme, speaking as someone who wasn't a fan of the film.

I didn't feel like bothering with something clever; the movie certainly didn't. Besides, the plotholes were (for once), not the largest problem I had with it, so that would've been less accurate as well. Here's my review:

If you follow film-related journalism to any meaningful extent, you'll know that some topical narratives crop up a lot more than others. The biggest ones are obviously comics, remakes, awards and casting decisions, with other, seemingly unrelated topics then flowing back to those, one way or another. Hence, the topic of (relatively) original sci-fi films is often inextricably linked to the persistent dominance of comic book movies at the box office  (including the increasingly indistinguishable Disney Wars), as audiences are blamed for the poor results of the former and hence the continued death of sci-fi.

I ignored the chorus two years back, when Jupiter Ascending and Tomorrowland were trotted out to quickly join the list of largest flops ever. This time around, the narrative was more muted (since this is technically a comic book movie as well, albeit an obscure French one), but still present, and I caved: even though I had extreme suspicions from the first trailer onwards, Luke Besson was the defining factor. Leon the Professional still holds up very well, and I have fond memories of Fifth Element from years back. After Valerian, though, I am highly hesitant to approach anything he made ever again.

Let's start with the good parts: conveniently, they are the very beginning of the film, the near-wordless montage that shows us not-ISS (since it didn't exist back when source material was made) expanding past its supposed scuttle date in 2023, until it eventually gets joined by alien species, and endures as a symbol of intergalactic cooperation, especially after it leaves the Earth orbit in 2300s. Film immediately jumps to early 2700s, and the beautiful beach planet Mul and its greyish inhabitants. While that leaned a bit too heavily into all the "noble savage" cliches (especially funny once utterly conventional bomb shelters are suddenly revealed on the same planet, with little explanation of what such a peaceful species built them for), I largely didn't mind. After all, the only moments when film ever gets close in quality is when its eventual antagonist explains his role in its destruction, nearly two hours later. Immediately after that scene, we are finally introduced to protagonists, Valerian and Laureline (also the name of the source material), and watchability enters freefall.

The ironic thing is, I was actually a fan of Dane DeHaan's performance in (underrated) TASM 2, and this was my first exposure to Cara Delevigne. Yet, I soon hated them both with utter passion. The last time I despised a character in a film as much as Valerian probably goes back to Brad Pitt's Father Figure in The Tree of Life. He is like Captain Kirk - if Kirk was a parody character used by the enemies of Star Trek's Federation to inspire hatred towards it. He is lazy and completely unable to handle even basic responsibility, yet is somehow a Major, with far more competent soldiers having to obey his whims. The main thing he really cares about throughout the film (other than himself) is how to fuck Laureline: the absolute majority of dialogue in the excruciating scenes they share together can be politely called "flirt" if you are really willing to stretch the definition, and has nothing to do with either the thin main plotline or the unrelated padding dragging it out for the sake of more action scenes. In many ways, this is less sci-fi than it is a shitty romantic comedy that happens to have blasters and aliens in it. (Which might be true to the original, that's neither here nor there.) Valerian even starts going on about marriage and honeymoon on the beach soon, even though it's utterly unclear why he would actually need or want to marry, or indeed, what actually draws these characters together to that extent. The only answer seems to be shared sociopathy: I stopped feeling any pity for Laureline for having to put up with that asshole once she irreverently complains about a large alien monster ruining her dress. Said creature just wiped out a squad of allied soldiers who died so that the two of them could escape, and the only reason it found them in the first place is because Valerian fucked up, yet the two of them couldn't care less, and neither does anyone else.

This isn't even the only such "mistake" they have made. In all, dozens of living beings die by the end as an (in)direct result of their incompetence, for which they never have to answer, and the entire film would have likely been only half as long if they stopped fucking it up so much for no reason. (Hell, an entire third of the running time might not have happened if Laureline managed not to mistake "18" for "81" BECAUSE IT WAS UPSIDE DOWN.) It's especially ironic because at the start, she's supposed to have been the perfect student while Valerian can't even read his orders, but later on, she's the touching glowing alien things after Valerian tells her not to, and much later, he appeals to rules and says "They define me", to which she replies "I hate rules." That MIGHT have been meant as character development, but it's a) horrible and b) barely connected to any preceding events. Though, same can be said about a lot of the things in the film: there's a whole transdimensional technology enabling a convoluted action scene taking place in a nonsensical alien bazaar and a few random dimensions to the side, and which NEVER becomes relevant again. At the same time, the film manages to show us silent, menacing death robots early into the film, literally say about an hour later only one person can control them, yet STILL waits close to another hour before they finally do what you expected them to do from the start (compare and contrast with Oblivion's drones, whose role gradually transforms from saviour to nemesis in what was the most emotional arc of that film.)

If you hoped that secondary characters could save this, then sorry to disappoint: by and large, they can be divided neatly into generic, indistinct soldiers and/or crooks (including Jabba's spiritual predecessor), and generic Arabic merchant archetype (two varieties: an actual Arab at the bazaar, and three stout aliens you can glimpse on the poster, whose role is to sell information the viewers have already figured out). While the former archetype is somewhat inescapable, the only time I saw the latter done right was in Pitch Black, so I can't fathom how Besson managed to make his adaptation a good decade after the Star Wars prequels, yet STILL end up with functional equivalents of Jar Jar hogging so much screentime. Rihanna's character COULD have been the bright spot (the fact I'm writing this sentence alone should tell you just how bad the film gets), but she's utterly wasted on one HIGHLY self-indulgent sequence, after which her role entirely subservient to Valerian, to the point she actively craves his approval, even though she is a better person than he (or Laureline) is in practically every way. I have literally seen fanfic self-inserts better than Valerian: the narrative just bends around him so much (in addition to all the above, he's essentially sci-fi version of Chosen One to boot.)

What's left? Well, the visuals are indeed excellent, creating a spacefaring world of the future that might be quite dated in some respects (i.e. while said Alpha, the titular City of a Thousand Planets, obviously looks enormous, its stated population is lower than modern-day Shanghai and Karachi), but nevertheless deserved much more than being a backdrop to this. Ironically, the film's only other good scene not only can be taken as a commentary on current refugee crisis (though given the age of the source material, it was likely intended to reflect French anxieties over their conflicts in Indochina and Algeria), but actually shows a legitimately good grasp of politics, and a glimpse of what the film could've been if it wasn't drowned in so much bullshit. Unfortunately, the soundtrack totally fails to either live up to the visuals or create a sense of a unique and memorable world: in fact, whenever I was tired of bullshit scene N and tried paying attention to the score, I was shocked at how indistinct it was, with basically no way to tell it apart from any other blockbuster. Worse, the action scenes are, if anything, actively hurt by this universe's possibilities. Whenever Valerian's enemies get something cool, you can be certain there'll be some other technology to save his ass 5 seconds later, so no complication ever feels meaningful. In these circumstances, no tension can be built, let alone be sustained, and so the outcome is never in doubt, and supposedly inventive scenes are paradoxically boring.

In all, as someone who paid to see this on the opening day here in Russia, I'm glad so few other people chose to make the same decision. Sadly, if this is the best any sort of distant-future sci-fi (i.e. not Arrival or anything still set in recognisably real world) can do, then we deserve The Farce Awakens and its interminable sequels and spin-offs.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2017, 01:48:47 pm by Robert Neville »

Robert Neville

  • Administrator
  • Ed Norton
  • ******
  • Posts: 1522
Re: THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD
« Reply #3679 on: August 12, 2017, 01:41:27 pm »
Speaking of Prometheus and underwhelming sci-if, I'm mildly curious to see what your reaction to Alien Covenant would be, given that it doubles down on some of Prometheus' problems but also spits in the face of the story its predecessor tried to tell.

The idea that "spitting in the face of Prometheus' story" would be a net positive inspiring me to see the film fundamentally misunderstands the issues I had with it in the first place. I despised how idiotic the whole thing was at every level, yet took itself too seriously & looked too well to make laughing at it any fun. (unlike say, Super 8, where I genuinely laughed a lot, and consequently gave it a higher score) I didn't hate its themes per se; so I don't really care if they were refuted in Covenant.

On a thematic level, where we are supposed to ignore characters' actions and look at it as a metaphor or whatever, Prometheus was simply too feeble to inspire more than a shrug. As far as I could tell, its big idea (other than the lame attempts to tie Engineers and Christianity together, which accomplishes nothing of relevance to the real world whatsoever) seemed to be "What if we actually were created just on a whim?" to which I can only reply "And?". If tomorrow we find out Engineers were real, how does my existence becomes more or less meaningful from knowing we were randomly created by another species that randomly evolved on another planet, as opposed to just randomly evolving on Earth on the whim of evolution in the first place with no middleman?

I suppose the idea such creators might then kill us might have been shocking to some, but really, I don't see why. We now routinely create rats that are not only all genetically identical to each other (that was accomplished long ago), but which are also all genetically deficient in a particular way reflecting certain human diseases. Essentially, we bring dozens living beings (even hundreds, for larger trials) that are condemned to a life of suffering from birth, subjected to trials that often make them suffer more, and then the survivors are all killed at the end regardless. I am not protesting that fact (given how many treatments have only appeared due to that process), but I am not blind to it either. All the Prometheus' characters are (supposedly) scientists, so they all ought to have known that. If so, why would they be surprised a creator alien species does not view us with any more concern or care?


So, no, the chances I would hate Covenant as well are just astronomically high. I would rather not see any movie for a while with "how bad it could be?" approach, after Valerian proved it totally could be utterly horrible. And if I did want to see a movie I suspect to be bad, Ghost in the Shell, Kong: Skull Island and Rogue One (hell, even Jupiter Ascending) are more interesting candidates than Covenant, if only because there are more arguments to be had.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2017, 03:40:51 pm by Robert Neville »

 

+- Hot Topics

The Official Movie Trailer/TV Spot Watching Thread by John Tyler
August 22, 2017, 09:52:57 pm

THE OFFICIAL MOVIE WATCHING THREAD by John Tyler
August 22, 2017, 08:57:06 pm

Game of Thrones by Diego Tutweiller
August 22, 2017, 11:53:30 am

THE TV SHOW WATCHING THREAD!! by Danny Darkoh
August 22, 2017, 02:37:15 am

The Movie/TV Facts Thread by John Tyler
August 21, 2017, 11:42:17 pm

Death Note by The One Who Lurks
August 21, 2017, 06:14:28 pm

Rick and Morty by CT_Sexybeast
August 21, 2017, 05:49:28 pm

Mother! by Diego Tutweiller
August 21, 2017, 12:56:22 pm

Tulip Fever by John Tyler
August 21, 2017, 12:37:31 pm

Atomic Blonde by Diego Tutweiller
August 21, 2017, 12:10:46 am

The Movie Pitch Thread by Robert Neville
August 20, 2017, 05:13:56 pm

Diego Tutweiller Presents: A Game of Trolls by Diego Tutweiller
August 20, 2017, 03:38:04 am

The One sentence movie summary thread! by John Tyler
August 19, 2017, 10:46:13 pm

Logan Lucky by Suspect #1
August 19, 2017, 03:02:35 pm

Recent purchases (part II) by Diego Tutweiller
August 18, 2017, 07:14:13 pm